UA-172871344-1
James successfully applied for the removal of a Personal Representative before Deputy Master Dray at a final hearing of a Part 8 claim at the Royal Courts of Justice. At earlier hearings of the same case, James successfully argued for an Order for Sale of a probate property in the estate under the authority of a Limited Grant (before Deputy Master Nurse), and for the appointment of an Independent Professional Personal Representative (Solicitor) to oversee the administration and distribution of the estate at the conclusion of the proceedings (before Deputy Master Brightwell, as he then was).
Is it always safe to assume in business that parties can freely discuss joint ventures, and that a signed contract is needed before property interests are created? Can an interest in commercial property be created following an alleged oral agreement and email representations, or is a discrete written contract always necessary? In business dealings, when do discussions to acquire property lead to binding obligations? In this case, James successfully represented the Defendant/ Respondent in an appeal before the Vice Chancellor, Mr Justice Snowden (as he then was), that dealt with the above questions.
James assisted the successful Defendant litigants in person to prepare for a complex trial before Mr Hugh Sims KC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court). The case involved issues relating to enforcement of judgment debts against the beneficial interest in the marital home, abuse of process, and the protection afforded by a Trust Deed. The Claimant’s application for an Order for Sale of several properties worth approximately £3,000,000.00 was dismissed.
James has extensive experience of working directly with clients, without the involvement of a Solicitor. James practised as a Solicitor for 12 years prior to being called to the Bar. James has extensive experience of preparing cases for litigation, not just as an advocate, but as a litigator dealing with day-to-day case preparation, and as the first point of contact for clients. James is the former owner of a law firm that specialised in private client and property cases. James never loses sight of the fact that the legal process can be a terrifying experience, with lives on hold and seemingly endless uncertainty. Many appreciate the added value that my "client focused", holistic, well-rounded experience can bring to resolving disputes.
James brings a wealth of practical knowledge and experience from his role as a Solicitor and Solicitor-Advocate to his practice at the Bar. James fully understands the needs and demands that litigants in person face. James also recognises the wider implications of a course of action, including post-dispute relationships, and the need to protect a client’s cost position. James always considers the “bigger picture” in resolving disputes. This involves a careful assessment of what will be achieved by "winning", and what it will cost to achieve that "win". The emotional and financial costs of failing to "choose battles" carefully in the context of civil litigation can be devastating. James can provide a much-needed independent perspective on how to progress matters. His objective is to achieve the best possible overall outcome in a case.
Over the years, James has assisted many clients through every stage of the dispute resolution process. James understands the hidden costs of disputes. James's aim to bring a successful closure to disputes in an efficient and cost-effective manner. His expertise and experience are balanced by a grounded approach. He provides direct, expert advice that you can rely on.
To make an initial enquiry, please send your contact details to James's clerk on the Contact Form that can be accessed below. At the enquiry stage, you will be invited to provide copies of your documents, and your queries will be addressed insofar as possible. The main aim at the enquiry stage is to identify your requirements and to establish if/ how James can help you. Not all cases are suitable for James to accept directly without a Solicitor. If James is unable to accept your instructions on a direct access basis, he may suggest the name of a Solicitor or other professional who may be able to assist.
James brings a wealth of practical knowledge and experience from his role as a Solicitor and Solicitor-Advocate to his practice at the Bar. James fully understands the needs and demands that litigants in person face. James also recognises the wider implications of a course of action, including post-dispute relationships, and the need to protect a client’s cost position. James always considers the “bigger picture” in resolving disputes. This involves a careful assessment of what will be achieved by "winning", and what it will cost to achieve that "win". The emotional and financial costs of failing to "choose battles" carefully in the context of civil litigation can be devastating. James can provide a much-needed independent perspective on how to progress matters. His objective is to achieve the best possible overall outcome in a case.
James successfully applied for the removal of a Personal Representative before Deputy Master Dray at a final hearing of a Part 8 claim at the Royal Courts of Justice. At earlier hearings of the same case, James successfully argued for an Order for Sale of a probate property in the estate under the authority of a Limited Grant (before Deputy Master Nurse), and for the appointment of an Independent Professional Personal Representative (Solicitor) to oversee the administration and distribution of the estate at the conclusion of the proceedings (before Deputy Master Brightwell, as he then was).
Is it always safe to assume in business that parties can freely discuss joint ventures, and that a signed contract is needed before property interests are created? Can an interest in commercial property be created following an alleged oral agreement and email representations, or is a discrete written contract always necessary? In business dealings, when do discussions to acquire property lead to binding obligations? In this case, James successfully represented the Defendant/ Respondent in an appeal before the Vice Chancellor, Mr Justice Snowden (as he then was), that dealt with the above questions.
James assisted the successful Defendant litigants in person to prepare for a complex trial before Mr Hugh Sims KC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court). The case involved issues relating to enforcement of judgment debts against the beneficial interest in the marital home, abuse of process, and the protection afforded by a Trust Deed. The Claimant’s application for an Order for Sale for several properties (valued in excess of £3,000,000.00) was dismissed.